Munurin millum rættingarnar hjá "Wikipedia:Undirhúsið"

Content deleted Content added
JoergenB (kjak | íkøst)
→‎Request for comment on inactive administrators: Better to consider the ordinary brúkaraíkast, IMHO.
Linja 212:
:::I agree with Eileen that there's no reason to have inactive users with administrator rights. The policy on most Wikipedias is that you'll lose your administrator rights after [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Removing_administrator_rights one year of inactivity]. I think we should contact [[Brúkari:Arne List|Arne List]], [[Brúkari:Twincinema|Twincinema]], [[Brúkari:Girdi|Girdi]], [[Brúkari:Jogvanj|Jogvanj]] and [[Brúkari:Rthomsen|Rthomsen]] and ask if they're interested in keeping their rights. Even though Quackor hasn't been that active, I agree with Jörgen B that it's benefital to have two bureaucrats, even though it would be preferable to have active bureaucrats. --[[Brúkari:Niceley|<math>\mathbb{N}</math>iceley]] 23. mai 2013 kl. 01:47 (UTC)
::::I didn't say that Quackor should not be a bureaucrat any more, I just mentioned how long time ago it has been since almost all administrators have been active here, hoping for some kind of response and discussion on this matter. I do agree with you Jørgen, it is not a good idea to have only one bureocrat. Yes, I know that Quackor made me an administrator 1 and a half year ago, but there has been very little action since then, and you are right, that he has performed ''bureocrat actions'', when he has been active. I also agree with Niceley that there is no reason to have a number of inactive users with administrator rights. One year might be a bit too short time for a little Wikipedia as this one, but a maximum of two years without performing any administrative actions or any other action I would say is enough to remove those rights from a user and of course ask them first if they have any comment or if they wish to become active again. I used [http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaFO.htm this list] (20 recently absent wikipedians, ordered by number of contributions) along with looking at the user contributions when I mentioned the period of inactivity of most of the administrators. Yes, you are right Jørgen, the list includes only article edits, and not the more important ''bureocrat actions'' or ''administrator actions''. Quackor has made [http://fo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serstakt:Br%C3%BAkara%C3%ADkast/Quackor one beaurocrat action] within the last year, it was on 28 December 2012. His second last action was to make me an administrator on 16 October 2011. I wish that he would become more active again, and I would wish that more people became active editors on the Faroese Wikipedia. Best regards [[Brúkari:EileenSanda|EileenSanda]] ([[Brúkarakjak:EileenSanda|talk]]) 23. mai 2013 kl. 07:24 (UTC)
:::::There is a risk in concentrating on article edits when you consider activity. If you had checked Quackor's ordinary contributions (by means of the brúkaraíkast option), you would have found out that he was active in december as a bureocrat from [http://fo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%C3%81heitan_um_bott_st%C3%B8%C3%B0u&diff=prev&oldid=250358 this], also without checking the measures he finally decided to take.
:::::I think that the truth is that there presently are rather sparce reasons for bureocrat actions in the fowp. (Niceley, how often have you found reason to act as a bureocrat, since you became one?) This of course is a bit of a pity; but there it is. [[Brúkari:JoergenB|Jörgen B]] ([[Brúkarakjak:JoergenB|talk]]) 23. mai 2013 kl. 12:13 (UTC)
 
== Wikidata phase 2 (infoboxes) is here ==